General observations on just about anything.
Could 1994 history repeat itself?
Published on October 4, 2009 By Nitro Cruiser In Politics

Set the WABAC (way back) machine to 1993 Mr. Peabody...

Now my boy Sherman...The Clinton administration had just taken office with a vengeance. It was filled with drama and far-left agendas (Zoe Baird, Hillary Care, TC Bombing, Don't Ask Don't Tell, etc), actually IMO much less hub bub than exists today, regardless, this was a big factor in a sweeping Republican victory. It was the first time in 40 years that the Democrats didn't control at least one of the houses. The rest is history president Clinton governed from the center and the US enjoyed a period of economic success.

Fast forward to today, the Obama administration. The Democrats control both houses in addition to the executive branch and the far-left agenda is back. Heath care reform is also back and losing support daily. Two wars continue on, one badly. Spending in just the first few months has exceeded every other administrations spending since Washington. Financial scandals have plagued cabinet appointments and czars with dubious backgrounds have been appointed. The rouge states of Iran and North Korea have flaunted their military advances to the dismay of the world. Attempts at atonement for past US "sins" have added to the presidents personal appeal abroad, yet has done little help, and possibly hurt, US prestige. The persons in control of government have ridiculed and ostracized the growing grassroots movement that disagree on the direction this administration is taking.

Could potential backlash bring back a Republican controlled Senate and House of Representatives? Would this force president Obama to govern from the center and possibly save his presidency as it had for Bill Clinton? Or will the damage be so severe that the people will remember long enough to affect the 2012 presidential election? If the Republicans do take control, will they have learned their lesson from 2006? Will the administration start getting it right and retain power in congress and the WH?

All is hypothetical of course, so there are no wrong answers. Perhaps you feel a different scenario may occur?

 

UPDATE    UPDATE    UPDATE

So over a year has passed and the Mid-term election is over. The results are not so surprising. Will President Obama now govern from the center? His address (after the election) was contrite, but will he now listen to the peoples demands? Take a page from the Clinton play book or "stay the course"? What say you?

As a side note, many of the folks that responded here could, without more than a passing interest in politics, see what was coming over a year out. I'm surprised that even if the president couldn't (or wouldn't) foresee this, why didn't any of his closest advisor's? Will they keep Pelosi, and the stench of failure, alive in the minority leader position?

The next two years will be interesting indeed.

 


Comments (Page 5)
5 PagesFirst 3 4 5 
on Jan 20, 2010

Nitro Cruiser
- Will the Democrats force the heath care issue? The loss in MA must be giving pause to some moderate Dem's, at least those that might lose their seat in November. 

- Will Reid stall seating Brown to give Dem's time to push the HC bill?

- Will the House Dem's take the Senates HC plan "as is" just to push it through to get something?

1. - They will try, but cracks are already appearing (Jim Webb says wait for Brown).  The leadership is going to push it, but the rank and file want to get re-elected and that is going to hurt.  can Pelosi keep the razor thin majority in place?

2. - I think they will go with plan B.  The house will try to pass the Senate version.  At least at first.  If that fails, they will turn to Olympia Snowe.

3. - That is the only thing I am fairly sure of.  My answer is yes.  But I have doubts it will succeed.

on Jan 20, 2010

I believe Jim Webb sees the writing on the wall, it remains to be seen if more will listen. Pelosi has no problem marching others off to the slaughter from the security of her San Fran stronghold. Reid, on the other hand, is in a very weak position in his home state of Nevada. There they are lighting up the torches and sharpening the pitchforks.

Olympia Snowe has to be looking at what happened so close to home. I'm not so sure she would be so open to the same suggestions that may have worked only a month ago.

Yes I feel there will be an effort to get something pushed. We should know better very soon.

on Jan 20, 2010

Pelosi has no problem marching others off to the slaughter from the security of her San Fran stronghold.

There is another thing to think about.  Pelosi is calling all the shots now.  If the house votes on the senate plan, the senate will never see it again (well, perhaps in reconcilliation).  I agree with you about her.  And with any luck, she will march the lemmings right over the cliff.

on Jan 20, 2010

Yeah, I do get metal images of Pelosi b*tch slapping Reid and coercing him to his part for the peoples republic revolution.

on Jan 21, 2010

Apparently George Bush didn't have those "major difficulties".

Sarcasm accepted. It is not the difficulties that define the president, it is how the president deals with them. President Clinton was first attacked by AQ, he did little to stop them, tried to make them criminals. AQ continued to attack right up to the end of his administration.

President Bush had to  deal with a recession the second month into his administration, followed by the China test of his presidency, got that calmed down and our people back, then 9/11 and instead of sweeping it under the carpet he did something. War was declared by AQ durning Mr. Clinton and we joined that war during Mr. Bush who said this will be a long war that would outlast his administration. He understood the danger, and our enemy.

President Obama took office, in response to AQ he began to show weakness to the world and weakend our security system. Our economy started to slide and in response he destroyed our ecconomic system. We get attacked again by AQ twice and it took a second attack before "terrorism" was brought back into the presidents lexicon. Is there any reason his poll numbers have nosedived? Well, yeah. He is an empty suit with little understanding of the world and how it works. The people are starting to see this and for some strange reason reject his ignorance.

It had nothing to do with "major difficulties" and everything to do with "major difficulties" because the variable is not the difficulty but how it is handled by our leader.

on Jan 21, 2010

The people are starting to see this and for some strange reason reject his ignorance.

He seems to think it is the same anger that swept him into office, is what swept Brown into office. Kind of like people holding their nose, saying you (Obama) stink, and him saying "They can't possibly me "ME",  they must mean Bush".

on Jan 21, 2010

He seems to think it is the same anger that swept him into office, is what swept Brown into office. Kind of like people holding their nose, saying you (Obama) stink, and him saying "They can't possibly me "ME", they must mean Bush".

In one way it is the same and you said it - anger.  But that is the only similarity.

on Nov 05, 2010

The voters have spoken... will the administration listen?

on Nov 08, 2010

Nitro Cruiser
The voters have spoken... will the administration listen?

no.

on Nov 08, 2010

no.

LOL that's pretty definitive!

I'll be relatively sure by the end of the first quarter of the new year in 2011. The left talk(ed) about Obama's massive intelligence (I haven't seen it, but) let's see if it's true or not. He did nothing to head off the election results, but now that he's sacrificed his pawns it will be interesting to see his next move, now that his job will be on the chopping block.

on Nov 09, 2010

The left talk(ed) about Obama's massive intelligence (I haven't seen it, but) let's see if it's true or not.

If it was true, he would never have done what he did.  The fact that he is too stupid to know that he knows not shows his lack of intelligence.  As such, since he cannot see how wrong he is, he will never try to change.  And thus he will be one of the stupidest presidents in history.  Perhaps only exceeded by Carter. (in intelligence, not in failure).

on Nov 09, 2010

Perhaps only exceeded by Carter. (in intelligence, not in failure).

Well I can't picture him building houses, so Carter will have that on him.

on Nov 10, 2010

Well I can't picture him building houses, so Carter will have that on him.

yes, Carter does have a trade.

on Nov 11, 2010

yes, Carter does have a trade.

Perhaps he can build a retirement home for community organizers before he passes on.

on Nov 12, 2010

Nitro Cruiser

yes, Carter does have a trade.
Perhaps he can build a retirement home for community organizers before he passes on.

Physically?  or mentally?  If the latter, I am afraid it is too late.

5 PagesFirst 3 4 5